You cannot write about a conflict management assignment without properly referring to the actual topic. Once you give the order for the concerned conflict management topic, our writers employ their in-depth expertise of the field. They try to respond as per facts, numbers, and realistic hypothesis with proven conclusions. In a conventional sense, they work upon five different conflict management strategies and apply the most suitable one as per the given scenario.

Let us look at them one by one along with their respective merits and demerits in the pointers given below -

Accommodating:

It is one of the commonly used conflict management strategies where the strategists abide by the rules serving the opposite sides of their wishes and desires. It also advises the cases where one of the parties observe the issues as negligible to successfully maintain the peace. The following are some of the common merits and demerits associated with this strategy -

Merits -

•    Accommodating Strategy provides an opportunity to get a glance at the situation from various perspectives.
•    The strategy helps in safeguarding all those interests that are vital rather than the ones that are not so significant.

Demerits -

•    Your ability as well as the confidence can get influenced in a negative sense while responding to an opponent acting in a very aggressive way.
•    If you do have the propensity towards accommodating, then there is a high probability of the opponent taking advantage of the same. He/ she or the opposing group can hurl abusive words towards you while you try to accommodate them to the cause.

Avoiding:

Our online assignment help related to conflict management opts for this strategy to pull down the fights for an indefinite period. The parties that wish to resolve the conflicts without any confrontation tend to go for an avoiding strategy. The people or the parties opting for this strategy feature low position and low honor. The merits and demerits associated with avoiding strategy are mentioned below -

Merits -

•    In case the conflict is taking place for a short period of time, it is not a bad move to proceed with an avoiding strategy.
•    When you are compelled by the opposition party in a violent condition, then you will always have an edge in delaying your response unless and until you are in an approving situation.
•    While dealing with an avoiding strategy, you are always going to avail time to collect and assimilate information. It always helps you prepare better before responding to the concerned opponent.
•    By adopting and avoiding strategy, you are going to get enough amount of time to focus on more critical matters and issues.

Demerits -

•    In a conflict where the other party is anticipating a prompt response from your end, one such strategy can adversely affect your relationship.
•    Your position might get negatively influenced and deteriorated.

Collaborating:

In the textbook definition of conflict management, it is widely regarded as an original solution considered to be acceptable to all the parties involved in the tussle. What is worth to note that is this form of strategy is not pertinent to all forms of conflict. Some of most common merit and demerits associated with collaborative strategy are listed below -

Merits -

•    It is extremely helpful in gaining common respect and trust.
•    It is helpful in solving the real-life problem.
•    It is helpful in forming a formidable representative status.

Demerits -

•    It is regarded to be more time consuming in comparison of other conflict management strategies.
•    It is imperative for all the parties to strictly abide by the mutually agreed and acceptable decision.
•    When the timing is critical and a swift and responsive solution is expected, one cannot look forward to a collaborating strategy.

Compromising:

The conflict management assignment writers offering paid assignment help take a keen interest in this form of strategy. It is primarily because this form of strategy brings two or more parties to the table by making them lose some of their essentials belonging to their respective positions. It eventually helps each of the parties to reach up to a standard decision.

The strategy is commonly applicable and considered as effectual in the situations where both the parties are having an identical position. It is commonly employed by the business owners who wish to negotiate their respective contracts with other businesses. The following the potential merits and demerits associated with this conflict management strategy -

Merits -

•    The amount of stress and tension caused by a conflict is effectively curtailed with the help of a compromising strategy.
•    The strategy is helpful in securing an effective resolution process.
•    Though it does focus on a temporary solution, it always emphasizes on a win-win situation.

Demerits -

•    To reach onto an effective solution, the conflict is required to be carefully observed as well as controlled.
•    If we speak in a long run, then the trust is not developed between the engaging parties.
•    When the parties adopting compromising strategy, they are compelled to agree on a particular decision without giving them much choice.

Competing:

The competing strategy focuses on a zero-sum game reflecting the fact that only one person or party can win the whole situation, and the other side ought to lose. It is regarded as an effective strategy when it comes to an emergency or the situations that are dealing with a small number of conflicts. The following are some of the prominent merits and demerits associated with competing conflict management strategy -

Merits -

•    When the strong actions or confrontation is widely regarded as a perfect reply to unfriendly or violent actions, the competing strategy is known for boosting self-esteem and known for drawing appeal.
•    The strategy is known for delivering a quick solution to the given conflict.

Demerits -

•    The implementation of this strategy consumes an immense amount of energy.
•    If we speak in the long run, it is going to impact your relationship with the opponent to an undesired extent.
•    There is always a possibility that it can provoke the concerned opponent to respond in the same way leaving no possibility for truce.